Beef Jerky vs Canned Tuna (in water)
Side-by-side macro comparison. Beef Jerky vs Canned Tuna (in water) per their standard serving sizes.
Canned Tuna (in water)
per 1 can (142g drained)
Macro Comparison Table
| Macro | Beef Jerky | Canned Tuna (in water) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 cal | 130 cal | -11% Beef |
| Protein | 9.4g | 27g | -65% Beef |
| Carbs | 3.1g | 0g | 0% Beef |
| Fat | 7.3g | 1g | +630% Beef |
Differences shown relative to Beef Jerky. Positive = Beef Jerky has more.
Quick Take
Beef Jerky delivers 116 calories per serving with 9.4g protein, 3.1g carbs, and 7.3g fat. Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 130 calories with 27g protein, 0g carbs, and 1g fat. The most meaningful difference: they're within 14 calories per serving, so calorie load is essentially equivalent. For protein density per calorie, Canned Tuna (in water) wins at 83% of calories from protein.
When to Pick Each
For Cutting / Weight Loss
When cutting on a tight calorie budget, Beef Jerky gives you 14 more calories of headroom per serving — that's room for an extra snack, more vegetables, or a higher-protein second portion. If protein density matters more (which it does for preserving muscle on a deficit), Canned Tuna (in water) delivers more grams of protein per calorie consumed.
For Bulking / Muscle Gain
For muscle gain, you want calories AND protein. Canned Tuna (in water) brings 130 calories — useful when you're chasing a surplus and struggling to eat enough. Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 27g of protein per serving, which directly feeds muscle protein synthesis. The best pick depends on whether you need more total calories or more usable protein.
For Keto / Low-Carb
Both Beef Jerky and Canned Tuna (in water) are keto-friendly with under 10g carbs per serving.
Frequently Asked
Which has more protein, Beef Jerky or Canned Tuna (in water)?
Canned Tuna (in water) has more protein: 27g vs 9.4g per serving. That's a difference of 17.6g.
Which has fewer calories, Beef Jerky or Canned Tuna (in water)?
Beef Jerky has 116 calories per serving vs 130 calories in Canned Tuna (in water) — a difference of 14 calories.
Is Beef Jerky or Canned Tuna (in water) better for keto?
Canned Tuna (in water) is the better keto choice at 0g carbs per serving vs 3.1g carbs in Beef Jerky.
Is Beef Jerky or Canned Tuna (in water) better for weight loss?
For weight loss, Beef Jerky gives you more calorie flexibility (14 cal less per serving). For preserving muscle during a deficit, Canned Tuna (in water) delivers more protein per calorie. Most people on cuts benefit from Canned Tuna (in water).
Which Is Better for Your Goal?
🔥 Weight Loss
Canned Tuna (in water)
Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.
💪 Muscle Gain
Canned Tuna (in water)
Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.
🥑 Low-Carb / Keto
Canned Tuna (in water)
Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.
Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.
Find Your Personal Macros
The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:
→ Calculate My Macros (Free)Related Comparisons
Other ways Beef Jerky and Canned Tuna (in water) stack up:
Full Beef Jerky guide • Full Canned Tuna (in water) guide • All comparisons