Canned Tuna (in water) vs Halibut

Side-by-side macro comparison. Canned Tuna (in water) vs Halibut per their standard serving sizes.

Canned Tuna (in water)

per 1 can (142g drained)

130 cal
27g Protein
0g Carbs
1g Fat
Full Canned Tuna (in water) macros →
vs

Halibut

per 100g cooked

111 cal
23g Protein
0g Carbs
1.6g Fat
Full Halibut macros →

Macro Comparison Table

Macro Canned Tuna (in water) Halibut Difference
Calories 130 cal 111 cal +17% Canned
Protein 27g 23g +17% Canned
Carbs 0g 0g 0% Canned
Fat 1g 1.6g -38% Canned

Differences shown relative to Canned Tuna (in water). Positive = Canned Tuna (in water) has more.

Quick Take

Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 130 calories per serving with 27g protein, 0g carbs, and 1g fat. Halibut delivers 111 calories with 23g protein, 0g carbs, and 1.6g fat. The most meaningful difference: they're within 19 calories per serving, so calorie load is essentially equivalent. Both deliver similar protein density.

When to Pick Each

For Cutting / Weight Loss

When cutting on a tight calorie budget, Halibut gives you 19 more calories of headroom per serving — that's room for an extra snack, more vegetables, or a higher-protein second portion. If protein density matters more (which it does for preserving muscle on a deficit), Halibut delivers more grams of protein per calorie consumed.

For Bulking / Muscle Gain

For muscle gain, you want calories AND protein. Canned Tuna (in water) brings 130 calories — useful when you're chasing a surplus and struggling to eat enough. Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 27g of protein per serving, which directly feeds muscle protein synthesis. The best pick depends on whether you need more total calories or more usable protein.

For Keto / Low-Carb

Both Canned Tuna (in water) and Halibut are keto-friendly with under 10g carbs per serving.

Frequently Asked

Which has more protein, Canned Tuna (in water) or Halibut?

Canned Tuna (in water) has more protein: 27g vs 23g per serving. That's a difference of 4g.

Which has fewer calories, Canned Tuna (in water) or Halibut?

Halibut has 111 calories per serving vs 130 calories in Canned Tuna (in water) — a difference of 19 calories.

Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Halibut better for keto?

Halibut is the better keto choice at 0g carbs per serving vs 0g carbs in Canned Tuna (in water).

Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Halibut better for weight loss?

For weight loss, Halibut gives you more calorie flexibility (19 cal less per serving). For preserving muscle during a deficit, Halibut delivers more protein per calorie. Most people on cuts benefit from Halibut.

Which Is Better for Your Goal?

🔥 Weight Loss

Canned Tuna (in water)

Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.

💪 Muscle Gain

Canned Tuna (in water)

Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.

🥑 Low-Carb / Keto

tie

Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.

Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.

Find Your Personal Macros

The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:

→ Calculate My Macros (Free)

Related Comparisons

Other ways Canned Tuna (in water) and Halibut stack up:

Full Canned Tuna (in water) guideFull Halibut guideAll comparisons