Canned Chicken vs Impossible Burger
Side-by-side macro comparison. Canned Chicken vs Impossible Burger per their standard serving sizes.
Canned Chicken
per 2 oz drained (56g)
Impossible Burger
per 4oz patty, 113g
Macro Comparison Table
| Macro | Canned Chicken | Impossible Burger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 60 cal | 240 cal | -75% Canned |
| Protein | 14g | 19g | -26% Canned |
| Carbs | 0g | 9g | -100% Canned |
| Fat | 1g | 14g | -93% Canned |
Differences shown relative to Canned Chicken. Positive = Canned Chicken has more.
Quick Take
Canned Chicken delivers 60 calories per serving with 14g protein, 0g carbs, and 1g fat. Impossible Burger delivers 240 calories with 19g protein, 9g carbs, and 14g fat. The most meaningful difference: Canned Chicken saves 180 calories per serving — meaningful over a week of meals. Both deliver similar protein density.
When to Pick Each
For Cutting / Weight Loss
When cutting on a tight calorie budget, Canned Chicken gives you 180 more calories of headroom per serving — that's room for an extra snack, more vegetables, or a higher-protein second portion. If protein density matters more (which it does for preserving muscle on a deficit), Canned Chicken delivers more grams of protein per calorie consumed.
For Bulking / Muscle Gain
For muscle gain, you want calories AND protein. Impossible Burger brings 240 calories — useful when you're chasing a surplus and struggling to eat enough. Impossible Burger delivers 19g of protein per serving, which directly feeds muscle protein synthesis. The best pick depends on whether you need more total calories or more usable protein.
For Keto / Low-Carb
Both Canned Chicken and Impossible Burger are keto-friendly with under 10g carbs per serving.
Frequently Asked
Which has more protein, Canned Chicken or Impossible Burger?
Impossible Burger has more protein: 19g vs 14g per serving. That's a difference of 5g.
Which has fewer calories, Canned Chicken or Impossible Burger?
Canned Chicken has 60 calories per serving vs 240 calories in Impossible Burger — a difference of 180 calories.
Is Canned Chicken or Impossible Burger better for keto?
Canned Chicken is the better keto choice at 0g carbs per serving vs 9g carbs in Impossible Burger.
Is Canned Chicken or Impossible Burger better for weight loss?
For weight loss, Canned Chicken gives you more calorie flexibility (180 cal less per serving). For preserving muscle during a deficit, Canned Chicken delivers more protein per calorie. Most people on cuts benefit from Canned Chicken.
Which Is Better for Your Goal?
🔥 Weight Loss
Canned Chicken
Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.
💪 Muscle Gain
Impossible Burger
Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.
🥑 Low-Carb / Keto
Canned Chicken
Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.
Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.
Find Your Personal Macros
The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:
→ Calculate My Macros (Free)Related Comparisons
Other ways Canned Chicken and Impossible Burger stack up:
Full Canned Chicken guide • Full Impossible Burger guide • All comparisons