Canned Tuna (in water) vs Ricotta Cheese
Side-by-side macro comparison. Canned Tuna (in water) vs Ricotta Cheese per their standard serving sizes.
Canned Tuna (in water)
per 1 can (142g drained)
Macro Comparison Table
| Macro | Canned Tuna (in water) | Ricotta Cheese | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 130 cal | 216 cal | -40% Canned |
| Protein | 27g | 14g | +93% Canned |
| Carbs | 0g | 4g | -100% Canned |
| Fat | 1g | 16g | -94% Canned |
Differences shown relative to Canned Tuna (in water). Positive = Canned Tuna (in water) has more.
Quick Take
Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 130 calories per serving with 27g protein, 0g carbs, and 1g fat. Ricotta Cheese delivers 216 calories with 14g protein, 4g carbs, and 16g fat. The most meaningful difference: Canned Tuna (in water) saves 86 calories per serving — meaningful over a week of meals. For protein density per calorie, Canned Tuna (in water) wins at 83% of calories from protein.
When to Pick Each
For Cutting / Weight Loss
When cutting on a tight calorie budget, Canned Tuna (in water) gives you 86 more calories of headroom per serving — that's room for an extra snack, more vegetables, or a higher-protein second portion. If protein density matters more (which it does for preserving muscle on a deficit), Canned Tuna (in water) delivers more grams of protein per calorie consumed.
For Bulking / Muscle Gain
For muscle gain, you want calories AND protein. Ricotta Cheese brings 216 calories — useful when you're chasing a surplus and struggling to eat enough. Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 27g of protein per serving, which directly feeds muscle protein synthesis. The best pick depends on whether you need more total calories or more usable protein.
For Keto / Low-Carb
Both Canned Tuna (in water) and Ricotta Cheese are keto-friendly with under 10g carbs per serving.
Frequently Asked
Which has more protein, Canned Tuna (in water) or Ricotta Cheese?
Canned Tuna (in water) has more protein: 27g vs 14g per serving. That's a difference of 13g.
Which has fewer calories, Canned Tuna (in water) or Ricotta Cheese?
Canned Tuna (in water) has 130 calories per serving vs 216 calories in Ricotta Cheese — a difference of 86 calories.
Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Ricotta Cheese better for keto?
Canned Tuna (in water) is the better keto choice at 0g carbs per serving vs 4g carbs in Ricotta Cheese.
Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Ricotta Cheese better for weight loss?
For weight loss, Canned Tuna (in water) gives you more calorie flexibility (86 cal less per serving). For preserving muscle during a deficit, Canned Tuna (in water) delivers more protein per calorie. Most people on cuts benefit from Canned Tuna (in water).
Which Is Better for Your Goal?
🔥 Weight Loss
Canned Tuna (in water)
Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.
💪 Muscle Gain
Canned Tuna (in water)
Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.
🥑 Low-Carb / Keto
Canned Tuna (in water)
Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.
Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.
Find Your Personal Macros
The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:
→ Calculate My Macros (Free)Related Comparisons
Other ways Canned Tuna (in water) and Ricotta Cheese stack up:
Full Canned Tuna (in water) guide • Full Ricotta Cheese guide • All comparisons